by GStack SaaS (LX AI)

Decision-support vs legal advice

GStack SaaS positions itself as decision-support: rule packs flag common regulated themes across markets you select. That is useful for sequencing work. It is not an opinion of counsel, a filing package, or a KYB attestation.

Keep three buckets separate: (1) themes the scanner can flag from your description, (2) questions for privacy/consumer counsel, (3) sector licences that need named specialists. Mixing the buckets is how “AI said we are fine” enters a launch review.

What stays in the product

Market theme flags from a product description
Optional narrative assist when AI is configured
Run IDs via /api/runs for later retrieval

What never ships as a claim

Fabricated user counts, rankings, or payment KYB status
“Approved in market X” without counsel sign-off

FAQ

Is GStack SaaS legal advice?

No. It is decision-support only; always verify with local counsel.

What can the scanner do without AI?

Deterministic rule packs still flag common themes without a live API key.

How are runs stored?

Each scan can store a runId via /api/runs for later retrieval.

Can I cite the tool in an investor memo?

Cite it as a theme checklist with primary sources — not as a legal clearance.

What claims are forbidden?

Do not invent traffic, rankings, or KYB approval status.

Who owns the final call?

Founders and counsel. The tool surfaces themes; humans close diligence.

References

Try the product: GStack SaaS

2026-09-17 · primary sources only · no fabricated traffic metrics · decision-support only